It seems that the media is constantly awash with stories of how the Brexit campaign misled voters through lies and deceit. However, this article will show that both sides lied, and that the outcome of the election was decided before anybody cast a vote. This leaves me with the thought that a new alliance is emerging between the UK, the US, and potentially Russia – and plans for civil wars are being worked on to cleanse the populations of the naysayers that may create gridlock in a future war scenario.
In the same week it was declared that Britain was to leave the EU, Germany and France outlined plans for an EU Army and there have been calls by leaders such as Angela Merkel to build one (also see here). This point only received minimal media attention. Much less attention than, say, the Brexiteer NHS lies.
This shows me that the media want Remainers to feel robbed. Why else would they decide not to cover this issue in a more balanced way? More and more, stories are emerging that are hoping to garner support for a new referendum.
Even the man behind the £350 Million NHS bus slogan lie, who evidently was influenced by Soviet propaganda techniques, believes now that leaving the EU could be an error… £350 million… Million. Why would someone who is a propaganda enthusiast say this after spending so much money on it and when he knows his comments could divide a nation?
Polarisation exists to some extent, however, disharmony about it is being intentionally stirred so that violence will emanate from and between these groups. Only then can a new moral order be implemented so that the threat to the old one from the internet (which is now being censored) can be cleansed.
When I visited Parliament the protests on opposite sides of the street for Remain and Brexit were only small – but now they grow every day. They create a visible representation of this manufactured division. This has been done to create a focal point for when violence erupts.
How do I know Brexit disorder has been planned? It’s simple, he who decides who will vote already knows the outcome of the election/referendum. Why could Commonwealth citizens vote, but EU citizens (some who had been in the UK for many years and grown up here) not vote? Anybody smell a rat? Commonwealth citizens are much more likely to vote Brexit – why? Because their families can get here more easily for one. Ask the Australians, who may more easily come to Britain soon.
The planned violence will also allow Britain to bring secessionist movements in Scotland and Ireland under control and to stall hopes of Welsh independence which could be fostered if Scotland or Northern Ireland were to leave the UK and join the EU. Counterinsurgency operations could also be hijacked by other influential elements in government. So beware!
The United Kingdom is set to ally with the United States, the Common Wealth, and, possibly, Russia, in order to bring about the downfall of the continental European elites who are seen as threats to the United States’ markets and resources in places like South America and Africa – where countries such as China and regions such as the EU are now entering. Donald Trump has already put the possibility of a US-Russia alliance on the table, although it is doubtful the establishment would accept this.
There are no doubt patriots behind these plans who believe it will be in Britain’s best interests – patriots who know history and see the world in real politics terms.
Is realism really the way forward? Ignoring the fear mongering and poorly monitored immigration procedures, hasn’t multicultural Britain taught us that we can all get along if we try?
Furthermore, if the elites of other countries are such a huge threat why not use other less destructive methods? We don’t want to fight your wars any more.
It seems that ‘elites’ of all countries appear to be the largest impediments to peace. Yet, violence, implemented through the state, wittingly and unwittingly gives much prestige to citizens of each country. Violence upholds all hierarchical structures in society so that moral orders are built and maintained.
These moral orders are falling apart at the seems as Eastern Europe moves against these values through the rejection of homosexuality for example. This was again seen through the actions of some football fans in Bulgaria and other places. This problem will not be solved through censorship.
This documentary outlines the links between Israel and the 9-11 attacks. This includes the planning and orchestration of the events by Zionists in the US and Israel. Media complicity is also shown, as many critical events that shed light on events failed to be substantially reported. This article notes that in many ways such Zionist elements may indeed be overblown as other important power players are forgotten in such descriptions.
Whilst mentioning links between the corporate war machine and the history of war in the US, the links with Israel become less clear. The links between France and Britain and other Western allies such as Pakistan and Saudi Arabia are also foggy.
Some links are outlined by showing personal connections like those between the Bush family and the bin Ladens, but their overall reasoning is obscure within the Zionist framework laid out by the maker – especially as some key players are certainly not Jewish or Israeli. I don’t believe stupidity is a fair evaluation for all of these people – it is too easy to tarnish all the non-Jews with the stupid hat, whilst the Jews are all super intelligent and to be feared. Whilst blackmail may certainly be used on politicians, it may work both ways.
There may also be shared goals between individuals. The Greater Israel Project and prophecies regarding the coming of the Christ may be ideas shared by Christians, Jews, and others alike. The rich may also favour a world where a global focal point may be used to more easily manipulate and control the masses.
The documentary covers some crucial points regarding the history of black ops and the use of drugs to fund these operations, and demonstrates that there most certainly has been a conspiracy and cover up with strong links and origins in Zionism.
SMOKING GUN EVIDENCE OF 9-11 MISSILE STRIKE
There is a growing body of evidence that missiles were used in the demolition of the World Trade Towers. Now yet another video has emerged that provides evidence of 9-11 missiles. The clip first appeared on LiveLeak, but the missile strike was only recently discovered by FBISMOSTUNWANTED.
The video also shows the projectile impacting the side of the building as it collapses, with debris of the building spewing outwards from the missile strike. This helps explain why the buildings appeared to explode outwards and eject debris far from the buildings themselves, which pancake floor collapse theories have failed to explain sufficiently well enough.
The projectile clearly moves from right to left in a downwards trajectory.
Original Footage –
The collapse occurs in the video at 13:29. The projectile can be seen moving very quickly across the building’s face through the smoke as the tower collapses. The building appears to explode outwards in the direction where the projectile was headed. The video below shows several examples of other evidence, as well as the edited and annotated clip (this version is quite poor quality – see original clip and gif). This video is useful as the missile moves very quickly and is hard to spot.
Frame by frame analysis:
The projectile is visible clearly in the first 3 frames. Later, the building can be seen to explode outwards in the direction of the missile.
Please keep this site running and donate to my patreon page!
This BBC documentary exposes how elements of the deep state work and coordinate together in order to bring about the desired outcomes to manipulate the masses.
The mass media’s critical spotlight on Martin Shkreli’s AIDS drug price hikes and his seemingly inevitable downfall contributes to society’s conservative mentality.
When Shkreli was arrested for allegedly committing securities fraud people rejoiced thanks to his former decision to raise the price of Daraprim from $13.50 to $750 per pill – which, to many, represented the endemic immorality of corporate capitalist greed.
Yet, it is unfortunate that the mass media focus has been on the demonization of this individual rather than of the industry itself. This more structural critique has been almost entirely absent from mainstream news. The patenting of drugs and the addition of exorbitant price increases is absolutely nothing new in the pharmaceutical industry. A sustained intelligent conversation regarding pricing mechanisms and the costs of developing drugs and the reasoning behind these has not yet materialised.
The most prevalent mood on social media and indeed in the mass media has been: ‘What goes around, comes around’. This mentality ensures that we ignore those who get away with some of the most heinous everyday acts that are normalised within capitalism – a capitalism that raises the life-long pursuit of profit to a similar height to religious and spiritual discovery.
This concocted mood fuels a move away from fairness via legal change on domestic and on international fronts. It also dampens the desire of the masses to pursue legal routes of justice against powerful groups and individuals who have broken the law at the expense of national populations. We think: ‘life will punish them, it always does. What goes around comes around.’ A feeling that if the law won’t give people the justice they deserve, then life will. Of course, this is not to deny that these things do happen from time to time.
Unfortunately, as we are all too aware, divine justice does not always prevail. Many bankers are continuing to make fat-cat profits, despite contributing to ruining the lives of many others through sheer greed. Prolific paedophile, Jimmy Saville, went to his grave without hearing his name destroyed in the eyes of the public and without having to face justice for his arrogant crimes. More recently, British Labour Party peer, Lord Janner, died without having to stand trial for alleged child sex abuse crimes.
Is the Shkreli coverage a conspiracy? No. It highlights, however, the superficial news coverage of every day issues that greet the ordinary person on the street, and a failure to address issues that critique the ‘free’ market capitalist system of which many media outlets are actively part of and help to prop up.
This site monitors the international corptocracy.